Home
About
The online mechanism
Reporting using a mobile phone
What are Non-Tariff Barriers?
Non-Tariff Barrier categories
Complaints
Register a complaint
Active complaints
Resolved complaints
Documents
NTB Reporting Toolkit
NTBs / NTMs Studies
AfCFTA / REC documents
Events
Workshops
Webinars
Links
Contacts
Language
English
Français
العربية
Português
Login/Register
Active complaints
Showing items 21 to 26 of 26
Go
Clear all
Complaint number
NTB Type
Category 1. Government Participation in Trade and Restrictive Practices Tolerated by Governments
1.1. Government aids, including subsidies and tax benefits
1.2. Restrictive practices tolerated by governments
1.3. Other
Category 2. Customs and Administrative Entry Procedures
2.1. Customs valuation
2.2. Customs classification
2.3. Consular formalities and documentation
2.4. Samples
2.5. Rules of origin
2.6. Customs formalities
2.7. Import licensing
2.8. Pre-shipment inspection and other formalities related to pre- shipment inspection.
2.9. Other
Category 3. Technical Barriers to Trade
3.1. Technical regulations, and standards including packaging, labelling and marking requirements
3.2. Conformity assessments
3.3. Certificate of Free Sale
3.4. Other
Category 4. Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures
4.1. SPS measures including chemical residue limits, disease freedom, specified product treatment, etc.
4.2. Conformity assessments
4.3. Other
Category 5. Specific Limitations
5.1. Embargoes and other restrictions of similar effect
5.2. Quantitative imports and export restrictions or prohibitions
5.3. Tariff quotas
5.4. Other
Category 6. Charges on Imports
6.1. Prior import deposits
6.2. Surcharges, port taxes, statistical taxes, etc.
6.3. Credit restrictions
6.4. Border tax adjustments
6.5. Other
Category 7. Other
7.1. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding
7.2. Other
Other
Policy or Regulatory NTB
Not a policy or regulatory NTB
Apply search
Clear search
Check all
Uncheck all
Date of incident
Location
CEN-SAD
Benin
Burkina Faso
Chad
Côte d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Eritrea
Gambia, The
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Liberia
Libya
Mali
Mauritania
Morocco
Niger
Nigeria
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Sierra Leone
Somalia
Sudan
Togo
Tunisia
COMESA
Burundi
Comoros
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Djibouti
Egypt
Eritrea
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Kenya
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mauritius
Rwanda
Seychelles
Sudan
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
EAC
Burundi
Kenya
Rwanda
South Sudan
Tanzania, United Republic of
Uganda
ECCAS
Angola
Burundi
Cameroon
Central African Republic
Chad
Congo
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Equatorial Guinea
Gabon
Sao Tome and Principe
ECOWAS
Benin
Burkina Faso
Cabo Verde
Côte d'Ivoire
Gambia, The
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Liberia
Mali
Niger
Nigeria
Senegal
Sierra Leone
Togo
IGAD
Djibouti
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Somalia
South Sudan
Sudan
Uganda
SADC
Angola
Botswana
Comoros
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Eswatini
Lesotho
Madagascar
Malawi
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Seychelles
South Africa
Tanzania, United Republic of
Zambia
Zimbabwe
UMA
Algeria
Libya
Mauritania
Morocco
Tunisia
COMESA
EAC
SADC
UMA
CEN-SAD
ECCAS
ECOWAS
IGAD
Apply search
Clear search
Reporting country or region
CEN-SAD
Benin
Burkina Faso
Chad
Côte d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Eritrea
Gambia, The
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Liberia
Libya
Mali
Mauritania
Morocco
Niger
Nigeria
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Sierra Leone
Somalia
Sudan
Togo
Tunisia
COMESA
Burundi
Comoros
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Djibouti
Egypt
Eritrea
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Kenya
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mauritius
Rwanda
Seychelles
Sudan
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
EAC
Burundi
Kenya
Rwanda
South Sudan
Tanzania, United Republic of
Uganda
ECCAS
Angola
Burundi
Cameroon
Central African Republic
Chad
Congo
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Equatorial Guinea
Gabon
Sao Tome and Principe
ECOWAS
Benin
Burkina Faso
Cabo Verde
Côte d'Ivoire
Gambia, The
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Liberia
Mali
Niger
Nigeria
Senegal
Sierra Leone
Togo
IGAD
Djibouti
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Somalia
South Sudan
Sudan
Uganda
SADC
Angola
Botswana
Comoros
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Eswatini
Lesotho
Madagascar
Malawi
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Seychelles
South Africa
Tanzania, United Republic of
Zambia
Zimbabwe
UMA
Algeria
Libya
Mauritania
Morocco
Tunisia
COMESA
EAC
SADC
UMA
CEN-SAD
ECCAS
ECOWAS
IGAD
Apply search
Clear search
Status
Actions
AfCFTA-000-066
3.2. Conformity assessments
2023-09-19
Nigeria: Port of Onne
Tanzania, United Republic of
In process
View
Complaint:
Nigeria has made it mandatory for COTECNA( Private Company) to inspect the sisal fiber that is exported to Nigeria, the same role is performed by the Tanzania Sisal Board which is the regulator of sisal in Tanzania, hence multiple inspections, and Nigeria do not recognize certificate from Tanzania Sisal Board. COTECNA charges an annual registration fee start with USD 1000 and adding up USD 120 per additional product and the fee for a certificate of conformity is USD 350 per consignment. which the Sisal Board does not charge for certificate of conformity
Progress:
AfCFTA Secretariat in contact with State Parties National Focal points to resolve the NTB
AfCFTA-000-025
2.6. Customs formalities
2023-03-10
South Africa: Skilpadshek
Botswana
Transferred
View
Complaint:
Basotho nationals had gone to Zambia to buy goods. On arrival they are detained at the border by RSA authorities saying they should indefinitely SARS to evaluate the goods and the brand owners who will check if the brands of goods e.g Nike shoes are fake or original. If fake they confiscate their goods bought with lots of money. They closed the border and knocked off and left them in the taxis they were in. No food, and no toilets opened for them to help themselves. South African shops sell fake new brands in thier shops, e.g fake nike takkies. Why do they treat people buying from a SADC region like this. Why are they creating technical barriers. These goods which are not stolen but bought are only passing through South African land. Please help our people. There can't be an African free trade agreement and on the other hand Border gate employees at a border between Mahikeng and Botswana on the south African side detain people indefinitely and knock off
AfCFTA-000-015
6.5. Other
2022-01-01
Mozambique: Ressano Garcia (Road)
Mozambique
Transferred
View
Complaint:
Introduction by Autoridade Tributária de Moçambique of a SINGLE ENTRY Temporary Import Permit (TIP) at a cost of MZN700, which is currently processed manually for the majority of vehicles at Ressano Garcia's KM4 facility.
The costs are prohibitive for companies moving transit cargo from South Africa to the Port of Maputo, with 15 loads per week per vehicle a common achievement. In addition, the delays experienced by the manual processing of the TIP document adds significant cost on account of the waiting time that drivers are subjected to. The Port of Maputo has collaborated with Customs in Mozambique to collect electronic payments for the TIPs, but so far only 10 companies have taken up the use of the facility. Even those companies registered on the Port's electronic system are not guaranteed speedy processing, and delays are still experienced by drivers as they still have to queue to collect the TIP document. Electronic payments should take precedent over manual payments, but in reality this is not the case. It is common knowledge that a R50 bribe will speed up the processing of the TIP document.
The SADC Protocol on Trade is clear in its reference to the removal of tariffs and non tariff barriers. At this point, the TIP cost to one company moving 180 trucks per month, is in excess of R1,4million ZAR or USD88,000. The manual processing compromises the integrity of the system and the costs directly impact the competitiveness of the trade route for imports and transit imports into Mozambique.
With the push towards the harmonization of regulations within the SADC and TRIPARTITE region, the TIP process should be harmonized with that of South Africa which has a multiple entry TIP valid for 6 months and is processed at no cost to the user.
AfCFTA-000-012
5.1. Embargoes and other restrictions of similar effect
2021-11-22
Kenya: Poultry products from Uganda have been banned from entering the Kenyan market.
Transferred
View
Complaint:
The government of Kenya without giving any reason arbitrarily banned all poultry products from Uganda from accessing the Kenyan market. It is not clear when the ban will end or if it will end. My clients have lost and continue to lose a lot of money thanks to this arbitrary and protectionist measure by the government of Kenya going against all the principles of the International Trade especially Kenya's obligations as a part of the East African Community Customs Union.
AfCFTA-000-011
2.5. Rules of origin
2020-12-05
Kenya: Namanga
Tanzania, United Republic of
Transferred
View
Complaint:
Republic of Kenya has denied importation of glass products from Tanzania Company Kioo limited.
AfCFTA-000-004
2.5. Rules of origin
2020-06-16
Niger: Gaya
Benin
Complaint registered with REC
View
Complaint:
Le Certificat d'origine (CO) qui accompagne la marchandise est signé par la Directrice de la Promotion Industrielle (Direction Générale du Développement Industriel) conformément aux exigences pour l'exportation des produits industriels. Malheureusement les Services des douanes nigériens exigent un CO signé par la Direction Générale du Commerce.
<< Previous
1
2
Next >>
Display:
10
20
50
100
250
/active_complaints/page:2/sort:date_of_incident/direction:desc/limit:#
Complaint
Close
{"delete_confirm":"Are you sure you wish to delete this comment?","sms_number":"SMS Number:","delete":"Delete","cancel":"Cancel","translate_error":"Text could not be translated","translation":"Translation"}
https://www.tradebarriers.africa/img/flag_icons/